The city is shutting down this park.
It is interesting to me because, for one, the topic of tenant owned vs park owned. They were dinged on tenant owned. I agree, however biased, with them that it’s a tenant issue. The flow seems like the city should mark it uninhabitable, the place goes abandoned, owner can take over through abandonment process, trash or repair/get new CO. Thoughts?
It also brings up the topic of licensing. I worked with an attorney in WI on the park I just purchased. He said he has noticed an increase in cities trying to used licensing as a method to escape grandfathering/as a zoning tool. What makes a mobile home park required to get a license? What criteria generally is required? I would have just though more of a business tax as the county dept. of health and safety is given of the rights the city seems to be giving themselves. Thoughts?