I have a park under contract but as I looked over the Frank and Dave approved contract, i didnt see anything in that seemed to cover the topic that the seller MUST sell for the specified price.
If anyone can point that out i would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks for the quick reply! I did a search of the document for default and i guess its simply not understandable in any laymen type terms but this appears to be it:
I am not an attorney, but I suppose i will ask my attorney to be sure this would stand up in a court of law but im guessing if you more experienced folks trust this that there is no concern on that end?
You should definitely, at a minimum, walk through it in detail once with a good real estate attorney to make sure you know what you’re signing up for.
That F&D contract protects the buyer and the seller has to really be on their game to not breach it. This was one of my biggest frustrations and why I quit using it. After I lost multiple deals because “your contract is too complicated” I decided to take on more risk and also use a simpler approach I could sell to sellers. I could only justify this because (at that time) I had been through over a dozen feasibility periods and have scar tissue to prove it.
I now use a 3 page LOI now and a state promulgated Unimproved property contract for my purchases. This is my personal opinion. A lot of other people have had a lot of success with long form custom contracts, especially those dealing primarily with institutional owners and syndications.